20 messages in org.apache.james.generalMarkMail: Powered by Apache James
FromSent OnAttachments
Jason Hunter07 Nov 2007 18:36 
Stefano Bagnara08 Nov 2007 01:02 
Danny Angus08 Nov 2007 01:36 
Noel J. Bergman08 Nov 2007 08:30 
Noel J. Bergman08 Nov 2007 08:34 
Danny Angus08 Nov 2007 08:39 
Noel J. Bergman08 Nov 2007 09:32 
Jason Hunter08 Nov 2007 10:46 
Jason Hunter08 Nov 2007 10:55 
Danny Angus08 Nov 2007 11:12 
Norman Maurer08 Nov 2007 12:16 
Norman Maurer08 Nov 2007 12:17 
Norman Maurer08 Nov 2007 12:18 
Jason Hunter08 Nov 2007 12:35 
Danny Angus09 Nov 2007 00:15 
Robert Burrell Donkin09 Nov 2007 02:51 
Danny Angus09 Nov 2007 03:06 
Jason Hunter09 Nov 2007 03:10 
Noel J. Bergman09 Nov 2007 09:52 
Robert Burrell Donkin14 Nov 2007 13:38 
Subject:MarkMail: Powered by Apache James
From:Jason Hunter (jhun@acm.org)
Date:11/07/2007 06:36:25 PM
List:org.apache.james.general

Some of you may have seen my announcement this morning on community@ about MarkMail, a new email archiving service.

http://markmail.org/message/q2dtugicwt6kzfdj

Apache James lives at the heart of the email ingestion pipeline, and I wanted to write in here to say thanks to the people who built such a useful tool. Having a Java-based extensible mail processor really simplified my life. If you see me at ApacheCon, let me know: I've got a T-shirt for you.

Funny story: It was when hitting some odd James behavior that MarkMail had its first "self hosting" moment. I noticed I could move files manually into the spool directory but they wouldn't be recognized until after a server restart. I searched on Google: "james server restart", "apache james server restart", and things like this. No luck. James is just too common a word. Then I remembered we'd loaded all the Apache emails onto our test system! Duh. So I tried "list:james restart respool".

http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Ajames+restart+respool

Bingo!

I do have a lingering question whose answer I couldn't find in the archive:

* Is there any way to easily employ multiple match conditions (subject is X, sender contains Y) without setting up extra processors?

-jh-